[oe] release-2010 - last moment hot fixes

Graham Gower graham.gower at gmail.com
Wed Dec 1 08:54:32 UTC 2010


On 1 December 2010 19:21, Frans Meulenbroeks
<fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/12/1 Petr Štetiar <ynezz at true.cz>:
>> Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> [2010-11-30 10:12:08]:
>>
>>> Do we already have some resolutions to these issues ? are there
>>> existing patches
>>
>> Yes, there are few patches around, but Koen didn't told us yet[1] what
>> fix/workaround he would preffer for Angstrom 2008/2010.
>>
>> 1. http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg13494.html
>>
>> -- ynezz
>
> OE is more than angstrom, and no single distro should  block progress
> for the rest, even not if it is the primary distro.
> My suggestion would be to upgrade uclibc + binutils. to fix things.
> Angstrom then can (and probably already does) pin the current versions.
>
> My 2 cents, Frans.
>

The alternative is remove uclibc bits from the angstrom distro conf,
removing all doubt about its current status as unsupported/nonworking.




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list