[oe] minimal{, -uclibc}: linux-omap-psp_2.6.32: task `do_compileconfigs` fails

[Khem Raj]

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Paul Menzel
<paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 18.12.2010, 22:46 -0800 schrieb Khem Raj:
>> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
>
>> > On 18/12/2010 11:10, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `smc #0'
>> >
>> > this seems to be a known problem with gcc 4.5 :
>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/669912
>>
>> Its not a gcc problem to clarify. Its just that older compilers did
>> not differentiate security extentions presence.
>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-natty.git;a=commitdiff;h=1ebe13dea156358f1044a7a755f02945ad3890e4;hp=f31ff7673ef77d04e74e1a1e45bb2940781f35f0
>>
>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-natty.git;a=commitdiff;h=99340d7b23f3df75d9b752fb25088a10064cd0a6;hp=9523bd6810e0229a8147e8c3d6498e2f40b38974
>>
>> are the fixes you should apply to kernel.
>
> I just wanted to add that `linux-omap-psp_2.6.32` builds fine with
> `angstrom-2010.x` (without the above mentioned patches) which uses the
> following toolchain.
>
>        conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf:ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION                     ?= "4.5"
>        conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf:ANGSTROM_BINUTILS_VERSION                ?= "2.20.1"

yes it will work with binutils < 2.21 the patch I previously implied
is in assembler.