[oe] Problem in bitbaking

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

.
>
> Sorry about that. But i wasn't sure if you read the ml daily. So i put
> you on the Cc.
>
> BTW, i would call the hint, that your commit broke[1] the baking of at
> least glib-2.0 (which isn't that exotic) an 'information'.
>
> [1] I've rechecked this again with angstrom distro and hipox,
> beagleboard, and x86 machine making a clean build of glib-2.0:
>
>  rm -rf tmp.5
>  bitbake glib-2.0
>
> Steffen

For me it also build for both i686 (machine eee701) and beagleboard.
key difference is probably that for me glib got build as part of
console-image. Didn't try a solo build of glib.

FM