[oe] New machine: Embedded Artists LPC3250

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/2/12 Ruud Althuizen <ruud at il.fontys.nl>:
> On Wed 10 Feb 2010 08:33 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> 2010/2/10 Ruud Althuizen <ruud at il.fontys.nl>:
>> > On Wed 03 Feb 2010 12:16 PM, Ruud Althuizen wrote:
>> >> On Wed 03 Feb 2010 12:07 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> >> > Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2010, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Ruud Althuizen:
>> >> > > In the attached patches there is a machine config and kernel recipe for the
>> >> > > LPC3250 based Embedded Artists development board.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > If you have any suggestions for the attached patches, please give them so I
>> >> > > can fix it.
>> >> >
>> >> > Please attach them. ;-)
>> >> Ah, now I remember that mutt discards attachments when forwarding :/.
>> > So, it's been a week now. And not even an reply. Any chance of this getting
>> > into the dev tree?
>>
>> I just skimmed over it.
>> First impression is ok, and as this will not break anything else, I
>> have no problems getting it added.
> I just found out about the patch queue and that my patch is added[1]. The
> problem is though that I attached _patches_. Both patches are useless on
> their own. The new kernel recipe contains all the patches for the board to
> be able to boot.
>
>
> 1: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1541/
>

Ruud, can you resend your patch.
I wanted to apply it, but you've submitted two patches and the text in
the first one reads:

This is a kernel recipe for the LPC32XX (LPC3250) based Embedded Artists
development board. It uses public patches provided by NXP and Embedded
Artists. The other two patches provide drivers for the PWM capabilities
and fix one NXP patch.

(and there are 4 files in the patch).
In order not to make an error I wanted to verify what exactly need to
be patched.

FM