[oe] [PATCH] meta-toolchain: Show the host system in toolchain archive name

[Antonio Ospite]

On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:52:03 +0100
Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger+oe at freyther.de> wrote:

> On Friday 19 February 2010 11:34:49 Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ospite at studenti.unina.it>
> > ---
> > In canadian-sdk.bb ${SDK_SYS} is used as a prefix but I find more logical
> > to put it just before the target system info.
> 
> The commit message is so weak I can't figure out a why... and I think you want 
> to have the signed-off-by in the commit message too.
>

The SOB line is in the "void" commit message already, git-am should
get it fine. I thought the brief explanation in the subject line was
enough, but evidently I was wrong.
Maybe using "host system" in the message is ambiguous as well?

I'd like to have this patch applied so that we can tell from the
toolchain archive name on which _build_host_ (which arch, basically) the
toolchain is supposed to be used, an x64-to-armv5te crosscompiler won't
work on i686.

Finally the annotation wanted to spot out the difference with
canadian-sdk which does already what I am talking about, I considered
not worth putting such "meta" comments into the commit message.

I am getting back to you with a more explicit commit log.

Thanks,
   Antonio

-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20100222/a65ce591/attachment-0002.sig>