[oe] [PATCH] git: add SRC_URI name

Chris Larson clarson at kergoth.com
Mon Feb 22 17:06:00 UTC 2010


On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 11:24 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop at gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >  recipes/git/git.inc |    2 +-
>> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/recipes/git/git.inc b/recipes/git/git.inc
>> > index 644e159..fd7b708 100644
>> > --- a/recipes/git/git.inc
>> > +++ b/recipes/git/git.inc
>> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "The git revision control system used by the Linux kernel develope
>> >  SECTION = "console/utils"
>> >  LICENSE = "GPL"
>> >
>> > -SRC_URI = "http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/git-${PV}.tar.bz2"
>> > +SRC_URI = "http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/git-${PV}.tar.bz2;name=git"
>>
>> Is there a patch to add checksums in corresponding recipes to use the name? Or
>> what is the purpose of adding one?
>
> I guess the idea is to make it possible for new recipes (which use
> this .inc file) to include their own checksums.  Seems like a reasonable
> enough plan even if the old recipes are not converted.

Has anyone thought about programmatically injecting a name to the
first tarball/zip in the SRC_URI if no sources have that name yet?  It
seems like adding a name to the primary tarball is becoming common
boilerplate, and the common case is for that to be the first source.
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list