[oe] Are we starting udev too early in the boot process?

Graeme Gregory dp at xora.org.uk
Sun Jan 10 16:38:02 UTC 2010


On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 09:47:41PM +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:20:20PM +0100, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > could it be that we are starting udev too early in the boot process?
> > 
> > http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5090
> > http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5246
> > 
> > Above two bug reports whose effects I can confirm would suggest that to
> > me.  But I'm not sure about the side-effects of starting udev later than
> > where it currently is at.  Anybody care to comment?
> > 
> My opinion is the dev cache code is wrong, it should cache into /dev which
> is the only place guaranteed to be writeable. There then should be a second
> init script later in the boot process which moves this to /etc/
> 
In fact to follow on from my mail, as 2.6.32 devfs has reapperred in the
kernel we could do away with the caching on modern kernels totally.

Graeme





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list