[oe] Patchwork Workflow improvement
Paul Menzel
paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net
Sat Jan 23 14:53:05 UTC 2010
Dear Holger,
Am Samstag, den 23.01.2010, 10:56 +0100 schrieb Holger Hans Peter Freyther:
> On Saturday 23 January 2010 09:43:24 Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
[…]
> I have pushed "holger/staging-branch" to the server. It does contain all
> patches from patchwork that are still applying. Please go through the branch
> and cherry-pick or follow up on the emails..
if I understood correctly you mean with »patches from patchwork that are
still applying« that the mbox file can be applied with `git am` as
`pw-am.sh` does [1].
That requires that all patches are submitted using `git send-email`,
which has been suggested lately on this list by several people, or that
everyone uses a MUA which provides easy handling of mbox files created
by `git format-patch`. Is that correct?
I will start a separate thread regarding `git send-email`.
> I also have a new version of the
> program I use attached... I will probably switch it to use pwclient in the
> future.
Thank you for your effort and bringing up `pwclient`. It is so sad, that
there exists a lot of tools and stuff one does not know about which
could safe work and time for oneself. I wonder why others projects did
not face the same problems yet. Probably every project or developers
wrote her/his own scripts (as OE did with `pw-am.sh`) and everyone
reinvents the wheel.
Thanks,
Paul
[1] http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Patchwork
[2] http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Commit_Policy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20100123/6762c76f/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list