[oe] [PATCH] vdr: Put common information in separate file and require it in the recipe.

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Holger,


Am Sonntag, den 24.01.2010, 11:45 +0100 schrieb Holger Hans Peter Freyther:
> On Tuesday 19 January 2010 10:57:38 Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Am Samstag, den 09.01.2010, 18:55 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> 
> > 
> > Could someone please commit this patch.
>
> two things. If you have a mail where 99.9% of text is quoted and only 0.1 
> percent is new, you are doing it wrong. Please throw away stuff when quoting.

Sorry, I will try to do so next time. Sometimes I am unsure about the
correct way. My intention was, if someone already had deleted my old
message s/he could still review my patch.

> The second part... could you please resend the patch?

I did.

> When I look here[1] patchwork is getting your patch totally wrong...

Actually it is almost correct in my opinion. What is displayed as the
patch is the needed mbox format for `git am`. Only that on the Web there
is always an extra line added and the items with UTF-8 bullets (•) were
stripped. I will check that later, because the Patchwork git log
mentioned something about UTF-8.

What `pwclient get 1438` retrieves is not useful though. :(

> This means this and all the 
> patches based on it are not in my new staging branch and I'm not able to 
> review them.

Probably I will have to resend the others too. I will check later.

On the other hand, I always attached my patches. But that does not fit
your workflow does it?


Thanks,

Paul


> [1] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1438/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20100124/dc9951fd/attachment-0002.sig>