[oe] Bitbake build error on Fedora 12 x86 64-bit
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Mon Jan 25 12:35:15 UTC 2010
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 25-01-10 12:49, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > still working on it, but a question. a while back, i observed
> > that one of the OE branches (stable/2009?) came with bitbake built
> > in, while the other i work with (dev) did not. or was it the
> > other way around? and there was some confusion as to why the
> > situation would be different between the two branches.
> >
> > can i document that, no matter what branch one is working with,
> > the proper approach is to download bitbake separately and make
> > sure that's the one that's being invoked. (i might add a short
> > side note that some branches came with bitbake built in, but users
> > should *not* take advantage of that.)
> >
> > does that sound reasonable?
>
> *If* is has bitbake builtin, users should use that one, as it is
> certain that bitbake will match the metadata. You can opt to choose
> to install a bitbake yourself, but then it's up to you to make sure
> bitbake and OE match. Since stable/2009 is a long term branch we
> decided to put bitbake in there to remove at least on point of
> failure.
ok, i'll point that out, thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list