[oe] [PATCH] classes/base.bbclass: add INCOMPATIBLE_MACHINE

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/7/7 Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org>:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 21:11 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> COMPATIBLE_ARCH does not exist at the moment.
>> Is there interest in it? (or in other words, do I have a chance I get
>> acks for it, if not I'd rather save myself the effort writing a patch
>
> Sorry, you're right, I had remembered it wrong.  It's ${COMPATIBLE_HOST}
> that I was thinking of, and I guess that doesn't do what you need in the
> specific case of cross packages.
>
> I guess I would be happy enough to see support for ${COMPATIBLE_TARGET}
> added to cross.bbclass if such a thing doesn't already exist.

I feel this is a good plan. Are there other supporters for this as
well (before I start working on it)?

The only concern I have is the name COMPATIBLE_TARGET
for me TARGET is the board so COMPATIBLE_TARGET for me more or less
equates to COMPATIBLE_MACHINE.
What about COMPATIBLE_ARCH or COMPATIBLE_ARCHITECTURE?

Frans