[oe] [PATCH][v3 3/4] uClibc: redo configuration

[Phil Blundell]

On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 12:02 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> I would have a feature called 'nobx' because most of the machines
> we support actively in OE has BX. With current state this needs to
> be added to MACHINE features for almost all arm machines. We can instead
> have nobx and keep USE_BX enabled and only disable it if nobx appears
> in machine_features. Otherwise I have tested the patches myself
> and they seems to work well.

I'm not sure that putting bx (or nobx) in MACHINE_FEATURES really
conveys any information that you can't already get from TARGET_ARCH plus
THUMB_INTERWORK.  It's also worth noting that the latter is a DISTRO
variable so, if you did add a competing bx flag to MACHINE_FEATURES, it
would be difficult to ensure that the two were consistent.

p.