[oe] Openjdk shark and cacao VMs not working - shark fixed

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Thu Jul 22 15:15:28 UTC 2010


On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI:
>
> Tested on om-gta02 (armv4t) and only -zero seems to work (built from
> yesterday oe.dev, waiting for todays fixes to built).
>
> SHR root at gojama ~ $ javac -zero Linpack.java
> Warning: no leading - on line 43 of `/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/arm/jvm.cfg'
> Warning: missing VM type on line 43 of `/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/arm/jvm.cfg'
> Warning: no leading - on line 43 of `/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/arm/jvm.cfg'
> Warning: missing VM type on line 43 of `/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/arm/jvm.cfg'

With current version jvm.cfg warnings are gone, but cacao and shark still fails
SHR root at gojama ~ $ java -zero Linpack
Mflops/s: 1.691  Time: 0.41 secs  Norm Res: 1.43  Precision:
2.220446049250313E-16
SHR root at gojama ~ $ java -cacao Linpack
LOG: [0x40190000] md_signal_handler_sigill: Unknown illegal
instruction 0xed1c5a06 at 0x441c2790
LOG: [0x40190000] Aborting...
Aborted
SHR root at gojama ~ $ java -shark Linpack
dl failure on line 696Error: failed
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/arm/shark/libjvm.so, because
/usr/lib/libLLVMCodeGen.so: symbol powf, version GLIBCXX_3.4 not
defined in file libstdc++.so.6 with link time reference

Let me know if you want more info.




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list