[oe] [PATCH 0/4][RFC] Remove CROSS_DIR, install cross-packages into native sysroot

Phil Blundell philb at gnu.org
Fri Jul 23 10:17:38 UTC 2010


On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 09:59 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 10:11 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > It's all 'arm-angstrom-foo', I was just about to make the suggestion to
> > change it to 'armv7a-angstrom-foo' :)
> 
> I've just been talking to Koen about this. When building for armv7a,
> TARGET_ARCH which goes into TARGET_PREFIX and TARGET_SYS is "arm".

Ah, right, I see. 

> I suspect if we change TARGET_ARCH to be armv7a, nasty things will
> happen but I could be wrong.

I can't think offhand of any bad thing that would result from doing
that.  It certainly might be worth a try. 

On the other hand, I also can't think offhand of any significant way in
which the gcc builds for different subarches are going to be different.
The architecture selection is all done at run time using -march in
CFLAGS, isn't it?

> Is that libiberty.a file actually useful or could we just stop
> binutils-cross installing it?

No, it isn't useful.

p.





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list