[oe] native preferences

Frans Meulenbroeks fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com
Mon Jul 26 12:08:37 UTC 2010


2010/7/26 Koen Kooi <k.kooi at student.utwente.nl>

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 26-07-10 11:42, Florian Boor wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I tried to build a "minimal" distribution image lately and ran into some
> trouble
> >  because the old-style native packages seem to be preferred over the new
> ones
> > using BBCLASSEXTEND.
> > In this case we have glib-2.0-native 2.24.1 provided by the new mechanism
> and
> > 2.22.1 gets build which is the latest old-style native bb.
>
> That's minimals broken by design behaviour, it refuses to pin any
> version. So either pin the version or switch to a sane distro like
> angstrom or shr.
>


Hm. I would expect that if there is a glib-2.0 recipe 2.24.1 with
BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" and  no pinning and no DEFAULT_PREFERENCE being in
effect, that 2.24.1 gets build and not 2.22.1 which has a real native
recipe. To me recipes with -native and implict ones with BBCLASSEXTEND =
"native" are equivalent prioritywise, so I'd say this is a bug in the class
code.

Frans

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFMTXI1MkyGM64RGpERAi1eAJ4q5Zwx4OTwV4sfjDFQ4GBE4uClbACfd2wo
> dYefl4wTR0njfF5r+bezfKs=
> =SfWy
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list