[oe] busybox mdev

[Bernhard Reutner-Fischer]

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:29:11PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
>I'm not familiar with that recipe and I don't seem to have a
>micro-base.bb in my tree.  But, if it's sucking in udev, it sounds like
>a bogus dependency somewhere.  You can use bitbake -g to find out where.

my bad, i ment micro-image.

i'm doing this now locally, fwiw.
cheers,

diff --git a/conf/distro/micro.conf b/conf/distro/micro.conf
index 26265a6..74989b5 100644
--- a/conf/distro/micro.conf
+++ b/conf/distro/micro.conf
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 #@MAINTAINER: Martin Lund <mgl at doredevelopment.dk>
 #@COMMENT: This distribution configuration defines a truely tiny OE Linux  
 #@COMMENT: distribution. The matching buildable image target (micro-image)
-#@COMMENT: basically consists of: libc, busybox, udev, sysv init, and a few
+#@COMMENT: basically consists of: libc, busybox, sysv init, and a few
 #@COMMENT: init scripts for running up the system.
 #############################################################################
 
diff --git a/recipes/images/micro-image.bb b/recipes/images/micro-image.bb
index c2cff93..19cb53b 100644
--- a/recipes/images/micro-image.bb
+++ b/recipes/images/micro-image.bb
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ IMAGE_LINGUAS = ""
 IMAGE_LOGIN_MANAGER = "busybox"
 
 # Include minimum init and init scripts
-IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "udev"
+IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "busybox-mdev"
 IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "sysvinit sysvinit-pidof"
 IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS = ""
 

>
>p.
>
>On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 17:09 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> Baking micro-base (not -image) tries to build udev for me?
>> 
>> On 17 Jul 2010 15:39, "Phil Blundell" <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 02:06 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> > (what's the reason micro-base u...
>> Er, does it?  My copy of micro-base-image.bb says:
>> 
>> # Include minimum init and init scripts
>> 
>> IMAGE_DEV_MANAGER = "busybox-mdev"
>> IMAGE_INIT_MANAGER = "sysvinit sysvinit-pidof"
>> IMAGE_INITSCRIPTS = ""
>> 
>> If it's using udev then that is definitely a bug.
>> 
>> p.