[oe] pcmciautils: fix build to use flex from sysroots, not from host

[Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov]

Hello,

On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> <dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> This commit
>>>
>>> commit c65ee13298e8c22274b5bcabe06f2116b8b7ebf2
>>> Author:     Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
>>> AuthorDate: Fri Jun 4 16:26:17 2010 +0400
>>> Commit:     Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
>>> CommitDate: Fri Jun 4 16:44:18 2010 +0400
>>>
>>>    pcmciautils: fix build to use flex from sysroots, not from host
>>>
>>>    Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> breaks the build when I have flex-native in ASSUME_PROVIDED.
>>> It there any specific reason why one should use flex from hosted sysroot ?
>>> is the flex package on all distribution broken for some reason ?
>>
>> Then we either:
>> 1) have to put flex in prerequisites, check it in sanity.bbclass (and
>> drop flex-native)
>> 2) have to fix pcmciautils to detect path to flex
>> 3) expand some class to autodetect the flex/bison/etc. programs
>>
>> Because currently pcmciautils just failed for me because I was building them on
>> the box where I had no flex installed, but build (via some other dependancy)
>> in OE sysroot.
>
> Well then you only need it in DEPENDS of pcmciautils thats all and not
> hardcode it

Fine with me. I'm commiting a patch which will drop the hardcoded path
and use just
LEX=flex. That should be fine for both our cases, shan't it?

>
>
>>
>> --
>> With best wishes
>> Dmitry
>>
>



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry