[oe] [PATCH 2/2] busybox: configure according to {MACHINE, DISTRO}_FEATURES

Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Thu Jun 10 20:50:40 UTC 2010


On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 01:27:36PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:

>> If you start factoring MACHINE_FEATURES into that kind of decision then,
>> logically, the package needs to have PACKAGE_ARCH=${MACHINE}.  I don't
>> think it would be a very good thing to start forcing packages down that
>> path unnecessarily.

This is unavoidable for certain special setups, isn't it.
>
>
>Fair enough, that seems reasonable for this particular case.  Now that you
>bring it up, we adjust package arch to machine when we use a machine
>specific file:// file, but maybe we need to teach it to check for references
>to MACHINE_FEATURES or COMBINED_FEATURES, somehow.

Both mmu and floatingpoint will need to look at COMBINED_FEATURES.
At least for mmu vs. !mmu PACKAGE_ARCH=${MACHINE} is unavoidable, no?




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list