[oe] [PATCH] ezx: Use pulseaudio 0.9.15

Antonio Ospite ospite at studenti.unina.it
Mon Mar 1 15:54:44 UTC 2010


On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:04:58 +0100
"Michael 'Mickey' Lauer" <mickey at vanille-media.de> wrote:

> Am Sonntag, den 28.02.2010, 16:49 -0500 schrieb Philip Balister:
> > On 02/28/2010 02:55 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > >
> > > On 28-02-10 19:57, Antonio Ospite wrote:
[...]
> > >> Cfr: http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5404
[...]
> > > NAK: machines have no business setting versions (except for kernels and
> > > even that is debatable).
> > >
> > > If it doesn't build, fix your distro.
> > 
> > I'm with Koen here, machines may be used by other distros so forcing 
> > revision selection for recipes (other than directly impact the machine) 
> > has no business in machine files.
>

Be patient but my knowledge of OE is still limited, the point here is
that distros can override PREFERRED_VERSIONs set in machine files, isn't
it?

> Of course one could argue that there is a bug in the OE recipes metadata
> rather than the distro, since the pulseaudio recipes are known broken
> for certain architectures -- however they don't contain any blacklisting
> or whitelisting except for om-gta01/om-gta02 which I added when I became
> aware of the problem. Antonio, lets just blacklist the broken versions
> for the machines you're interested in.
>
> :M:

I can well add DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_om-a780 = "-1"
in both pulseaudio_0.9.21.bb and pulseaudio_0.9.19.bb
Is that what you mean Mickey?
Way better than my solution but still a bit hackish.
If that's OK for you, it'll be fine with me as well.

About fixing distro, isn't 'minimal' supposed to build all the latest
recipes? If so a  conf/distro/include/preferred-minimal-versions.inc
would not have much sense if we can't set preference rules per
machines (or archs).

Thanks,
   Antonio

-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20100301/9fffde87/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list