[oe] linux vs. linux-libc-headers?

[Phil Blundell]

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 12:00 +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> Am 05.05.2010 11:42, wrote Graeme Gregory:
> > I thought glibc was supposed to gracefully fall back on missing syscalls?
> 
> May be, but not satisfactorily.
> 
> E.g. we've seen that g_file_monitor (from glib) falls back to
> polling each second instead of using inotify_init.

That sounds like it's just a bug in glibc.  I guess you should fix it
there.

p.