[oe] meta-toolchain doesn't build due to gdb-cross-sdk

[Antonio Ospite]

On Tue, 11 May 2010 23:39:29 +1000
Angus Lees <alees at google.com> wrote:

> It looks like the do_stage() removal was good, but the "inherit cross"
> refactor broke task-sdk-host and all the SDKs that depend on it.  I suggest
> reverting most of 4cf6a6bf83ccb13e7238927d72e77c4612fe6543 (but I'm hardly
> an expert).
> 
>  - Gus
>

Ping.

meta-toolchain still does not build in org.oe.dev, but Angus' workaround
worked for me too, thanks.

Regards,
   Antonio

> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 03:25, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Thomas Jourdan <thomas.jourdan at yaeld.fr>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > The problems seems to come from the conversion to new staging mode in
> > > GDB.
> >
> > right
> >
> > Now, gdb-cross-sdk inherits from sdk and cross whereas before it
> > > only inherited from cross.
> > >
> > > Reverting Khem Raj GDB patches fixes the build for me (meta-toolchain
> > > works again).
> >
> > thats because gdb 7.1 is then not using new staging and hence it builds
> > again.
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > > Le vendredi 07 mai 2010 à 11:30 +0200, Koen Kooi a écrit :
> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >> Hash: SHA1
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Currently meta-toolchain is unbuildable:
> > >>
> > >> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['gdb-cross-sdk']
> > >> NOTE: Runtime target 'task-sdk-host' is unbuildable, removing...
> > >> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['task-sdk-host',
> > >> 'gdb-cross-sdk']
> > >> ERROR: Required build target 'meta-toolchain' has no buildable
> > providers.
> > >> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['meta-toolchain',
> > >> 'task-sdk-host', 'gdb-cross-sdk']
> > >> Command execution failed: Traceback (most recent call last):
> > >>   File "/OE/bitbake/lib/bb/command.py", line 88, in runAsyncCommand
> > >>     commandmethod(self.cmds_async, self, options)
> > >>   File "/OE/bitbake/lib/bb/command.py", line 174, in buildTargets
> > >>     command.cooker.buildTargets(pkgs_to_build, task)
> > >>   File "/OE/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py", line 757, in buildTargets
> > >>     taskdata.add_unresolved(localdata, self.status)
> > >>   File "/OE/bitbake/lib/bb/taskdata.py", line 562, in add_unresolved
> > >>     self.remove_runtarget(self.getrun_id(target))
> > >>   File "/OE/bitbake/lib/bb/taskdata.py", line 535, in remove_runtarget
> > >>     self.fail_fnid(fnid, missing_list)
> > >>   File "/OE/bitbake/lib/bb/taskdata.py", line 495, in fail_fnid
> > >>     self.remove_runtarget(target, missing_list)
> > >>   File "/OE/bitbake/lib/bb/taskdata.py", line 535, in remove_runtarget
> > >>     self.fail_fnid(fnid, missing_list)
> > >>   File "/OE/bitbake/lib/bb/taskdata.py", line 490, in fail_fnid
> > >>     self.remove_buildtarget(target, missing_list)
> > >>   File "/OE/bitbake/lib/bb/taskdata.py", line 519, in remove_buildtarget
> > >>     raise bb.providers.NoProvider
> > >> NoProvider
> > >>
> > >> The weird thing is that 'bitbake gdb-cross-sdk' *DOES* work. Any ideas?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> regards,
> > >>
> > >> Koen


-- 
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it

PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20100513/f896c633/attachment-0002.sig>