[oe] [PATCH] tar: upgrade to version 1.25

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org> wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 06:48 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
>>
>> On 11/17/2010 06:18 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/17/2010 06:13 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Garman<sgarman at zenlinux.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb | 6 ------
>>>> recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb | 6 ++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>> delete mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb
>>>> create mode 100644 recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb
>>>> deleted file mode 100644
>>>> index dc37247..0000000
>>>> --- a/recipes/tar/tar_1.23.bb
>>>> +++ /dev/null
>>>> @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
>>>> -require tar.inc
>>>> -
>>>> -PR = "${INC_PR}"
>>>> -
>>>> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "41e2ca4b924ec7860e51b43ad06cdb7e"
>>>> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
>>>> "c9328372db62fbb1d94c9e4e3cefc961111af46de47085b635359c00a0eebe36"
>>>> diff --git a/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..c611f77
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/recipes/tar/tar_1.25.bb
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>>>> +require tar.inc
>>>> +
>>>> +PR = "${INC_PR}"
>>>> +
>>>> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "6e497f861c77bbba2f7da4e10270995b"
>>>> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
>>>> "f3f6ce41b8e0f327abd05c95990f113ddafbae131e10f79a99728ed46458494b"
>>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Philip Balister <philip at balister.org>
>>>
>>> Can you add tar-1.23 to the removal.txt file? Ask it be removed in a
>>> couple of months. This way we have a schedule to delete the older recipe.
>>
>> Thanks for the quick ack, Philip. Question though on the removal.txt
>> addition - this patch deletes the v1.23 version already. Does it need to
>> be kept around instead? I would think not given that this is a pretty
>> trivial update.
>>
>> Perhaps you meant tar v1.18 and/or v1.20, which are still there?
>
> Oops, I wasn't paying that close attention. I'd still leave 1.23 around for
> a couple of months, just in case there is some weird issue with 1.25. We
> should check on the older ones and add them to removal.txt also. I'd like to
> see us get into a sane clean up old stuff cycle, instead of the delete
> everything at once approach. Of course checking to see if any in tree
> distros use them is  good thing.
>

Yeah probably a sane thing. Make 1.25 default and let 1.23 linger
around for a while
just in case.

> Philip
>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>