[oe] recipy_sanity experiment

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Fri Oct 8 22:58:21 UTC 2010


On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks
<fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> as a test I decided to run recipe_sanity on our tree, and here are the results
> There are 1801 warnings:


interesting data

>
>    954 candidate for removal of S
>    373 LICENSE should be defined to something other than default (unknown)

this should be fixed first.

>    181 RDEPENDS should be RDEPENDS_${PN}
>     91 candidate for removal of FILESDIR
>     74 candidate for removal of PV
>     49 native or cross recipe with non-empty PACKAGES
>     11 RRECOMMENDS should be RRECOMMENDS_${PN}
>      6 candidate for removal of FILESPATH
>      4 LICENSE should be set
>      1 DESCRIPTION should be set
>
> Rest are for overwrites of a variable like:
>      4 rename of variable 'FILES_${PN}' to 'FILES_orinoco-modules'
> overwrote existing value '/lib/modules/' with '/etc /lib/modules'.
> There are about 25 different lines of this (total about 50 lines)
>
> Not sure exactly what should be done about it. I can fix some of them,
> but not too sure about the rename thing
> and the removal of S is often because there is an S = xyz_${PN} line
> in an inc file
>
> Anyway, wanted to know the results (and here they are).
> I  can provide more detailed info if needed
>
> Have fun! Frans
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list