[oe] [PATCH] gedit: add dependencies enchant & gnome-doc-utils-native

[Paul Menzel]

Am Montag, den 11.10.2010, 22:52 +0200 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks:
> 2010/10/11 Andreas Mueller <schnitzeltony at gmx.de>:
> > * 'bitbake gedit' on clean system failed during
> > * configure: missing enchant
> > * compile: gedit.xml unknown "element article"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Mueller <schnitzeltony at gmx.de>
> > ---
> >  recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb b/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb
> > index 83dffcf..4ab204c 100644
> > --- a/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb
> > +++ b/recipes/gnome/gedit_2.30.0.bb
> > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ DESCRIPTION = "GNOME editor"
> >  SECTION = "x11/gnome"
> >  LICENSE = "GPL"
> >
> > -DEPENDS = "iso-codes gnome-common glib-2.0 gtk+ gconf gtksourceview2"
> > +DEPENDS = "iso-codes gnome-common glib-2.0 gtk+ gconf gtksourceview2 enchant gnome-doc-utils-native"
> >  RDEPENDS_${PN} += " gtksourceview2"
> >  PR = "r2"
> >
> >
> I can understand from your commit message why you add enchant to
> DEPENDS, however it is not really clear why gnome-doc-utils-native is
> added. Is this because of the gedit.xml unknown?
> Can you clarify this in the commit message?

I resent this series [1–4]. I tried to keep the meta data intact, but
Andreas it would be nice if you could check again.


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3217/
[2] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3218/
[3] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3219/
[4] http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3220/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20101012/d97b8c78/attachment-0002.sig>