[oe] Question about OVERRIDES precedence

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 13-10-10 23:38, Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Maupin, Chase <chase.maupin at ti.com> wrote:
> 
>> That was my thought as well but I can consistently cause this issue.  I
>> have tested a quick change that seems to fix the issue by reversing the list
>> before it is used in the for loop.  My change was:
> 
> 
> From discussion on IRC, we think we should just reverse the definition of
> OVERRIDES in OE, this avoids compatibility issues associated with changing
> the implementation.

Isn't the definition covered in the bitbake docs? I'm in favour of
fixing bitbake instead working around it in OE.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMtwRCMkyGM64RGpERAhyDAJ0ZKsVJEzs2Fo8iXR7F32ijePz+lwCeMuHT
vfpaqzI6gh8aKRBwE5h1WA4=
=9m/w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----