[oe] [PATCH 2/2] Fix class OVERRIDES order

[Chris Larson]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Maupin, Chase <chase.maupin at ti.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chase Maupin [mailto:chasemaupin03 at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 3:32 PM
> > To: openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> > Cc: Maupin, Chase
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Fix class OVERRIDES order
> >
> > * Changed the OVERRIDES settings in the classes to use the new
> >   ordering.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin <Chase.Maupin at ti.com>
>
> I was a little unsure of these which is why I put them in a separate patch.
>  Should the virtclass overrides be high or low priority?  Please feel free
> to correct me, but I wanted to make sure that we didn't override "local"


I personally think low is best, otherwise virtclass-native would override,
say, something specific to a certain architecture -- but architecture
specifics still apply to a native recipe, as we are still building for that
architecture.  Others may disagree, though, and I'm certainly open to
alternative views on the subject.
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics