[oe] <package>-static name conflict with some recipes

[Andrea Adami]

BUMP

only a few recipes remaining.
First question is, are those -static really needed? If so, then please
propose a renaming.

Regards

Andrea

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have seen that we have parallel recipes for some applications for static
> build
> called package-static.bb like below
>
> ./dialog/dialog-static_1.1-20080819.bb
> ./busybox/busybox-static_1.2.1.bb
> ./busybox/busybox-static_1.11.3.bb
DONE > ./kexec-tools/kexec-tools-klibc-static_1.101.bb
DONE> ./kexec-tools/kexec-tools-klibc-static_2.0.1.bb
DONE> ./zaurus-utils/nandlogical-klibc-static_1.0.0.bb
DONE> ./klibc/klibc-utils-static_1.5.15+1.5.16.bb
DONE> ./klibc/klibc-utils-static_1.5.18.bb
DONE> ./klibc/klibc-utils-static_1.5.15.bb
DONE> ./klibc/klibc-utils-static_1.5.bb
DONE> ./klibc/klibc-utils-static_1.5.17.bb
> ./skype/skype-static_2.0.0.72.bb
> ./udev/udev-static-devices.bb
> ./udev/udev-static_124.bb
>
> Now they conflict with the automatic package that we generate to bundle
> static libraries. Since the the packages which bundle static libraries
> are essentially development packages may be they should be called
>
> <package>-dev-static instead of <package>-static
>
> IMO that will avoid the conflict and also clarify the package content
> a bit
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Khem
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>