[oe] [PATCH][STABLE] libusb1_1.0.8: new recipe

[Vitus Jensen]

I probably should have created a new thread for this patch...

If someone wants libusb1 on big-endian machines in stable/2009 he needs 
this patch.  .dev is already on 1.0.8, should we support libusb1 on 
stable?

Vitus


On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Vitus Jensen wrote:

>
> Signed-off-by: Vitus Jensen <vjensen at gmx.de>
> ---
> recipes/libusb/libusb1_1.0.8.bb |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 recipes/libusb/libusb1_1.0.8.bb
>
> diff --git a/recipes/libusb/libusb1_1.0.8.bb b/recipes/libusb/libusb1_1.0.8.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f264321
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/recipes/libusb/libusb1_1.0.8.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +DESCRIPTION = "library to provide userspace access to USB devices"
> +HOMEPAGE = "http://libusb.sf.net"
> +SECTION = "libs"
> +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1"
> +
> +PR = "r0"
> +
> +SRC_URI = " \
> +	${SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR}/libusb/libusb-${PV}.tar.bz2;name=tar \
> +	"
> +S = "${WORKDIR}/libusb-${PV}"
> +
> +inherit autotools_stage pkgconfig binconfig lib_package
> +
> +EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-build-docs"
> +
> +LIBTOOL = "${HOST_SYS}-libtool"
> +EXTRA_OEMAKE = "'LIBTOOL=${LIBTOOL}'"
> +
> +PACKAGES =+ "libusbpp"
> +FILES_libusbpp = "${libdir}/libusbpp*.so.*"
> +
> +SRC_URI[tar.md5sum] = "37d34e6eaa69a4b645a19ff4ca63ceef"
> +SRC_URI[tar.sha256sum] = "21d0d3a5710f7f4211c595102c6b9eccb42435a17a4f5bd2c3f4166ab1badba9"
>

-- 
Vitus Jensen, Hannover, Germany, Universe (current)
pgp public key available from keyservers