[oe] [PATCH] p4: remove broken and 4 years old recipes.

Frans Meulenbroeks fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com
Wed Sep 15 12:23:06 UTC 2010


2010/9/15 Philip Balister <philip at balister.org>:
> On 09/15/2010 02:32 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>
>> 2010/9/15 Graham Gower<graham.gower at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Recipes are broken for all architectures except one (probably arm)
>>> because the files in the SRC_URI depend on TARGET_ARCH and the md5/sha256
>>> are presumably valid only for one of these.
>>>
>>> Anyone wanting perforce should submit new recipes for new perforce
>>> versions.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Graham Gower<graham.gower at gmail.com>
>>
>> Agree with the reasoning of Graham, so:
>>
>> Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks<fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com>
>>
>> Actually I am not too keen on having recipes that just "install" an
>> externally downloaded binary blob
>> (and functionally speaking this does not seem to be something for an
>> embedded system either)
>
> I will have a need for a recipe to install binary blobs (fpga bin files)
> into a file system at some point. So this class recipes are needed.
>
> Philip

I'm not saying it should be made technically impossible or so.
Actually I do have recipes that install fpga images too, but these
live in an overlay.
As I do actual product development with oe I am just not too keen on
pulling binary stuff from elsewhere.

And rereading my message I can imagine some misunderstanding.

I wrote
>> (and functionally speaking this does not seem to be something for an
>> embedded system either)
and with this, I wanted to refer to the functionality provided by P4
(a high end SCM if I grasp it right), not to binary recipes in
general.

Apologies for the confusion.

Frans




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list