[oe] [PATCH] at91bootstrap.inc: Mark COMPATIBLE_MACHINEs.

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 22-09-10 20:26, Tom Rini wrote:
> Graham Gower wrote:
>> On 22 September 2010 17:31, Marco Cavallini <koansoftware at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Graham Gower ha scritto, Il 22/09/2010 09:36:
>>>> On 22 September 2010 16:43, Marcin Juszkiewicz
>>>> <marcin at juszkiewicz.com.pl> wrote:
>>>>> Dnia środa, 22 września 2010 o 02:41:52 Graham Gower napisał(a):
>>>>>
>>>>>> --- a/recipes/at91bootstrap/at91bootstrap.inc
>>>>>> +++ b/recipes/at91bootstrap/at91bootstrap.inc
>>>>>> +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE =
>>>>>> "(afeb9260|at91cap9adk|at91sam9g20ek|at91sam9rlek|at91sam9263ek|at91sam926
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 0ek|at91sam9xeek|at91sam9261ek)"
>>>>> mk355 is also atmel at91sam9263 so at91bootstrap is used on it
>>>>> probably.
>>>>>
>>>> The compatible machines here are those that have a defconfig in the
>>>> the files/ directory.
>>>>
>>> Yes please
>>> mh55 is also atmel at91sam9263 so at91bootstrap is used on it too.
>>> It also have its defconfig in the recipes/linux/linux-2.6.28/mh355/
>>> directory.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ok, well the defconfigs are duplicated into this recipe dir (probably
>> a bad thing). To support mh55, you would have to copy the defconfig in
>> and add it to COMPATIBLE_MACHINE.
> 
> It sounds like, and trying not to open a different can of worms, but the
> at91 stuff should perhaps be using one of those hooks for grouping a set
> of machines together?

It is indeed what SOC_FAMILY was designed to do: group SOC related
features instead of formfactor features
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMmlIHMkyGM64RGpERAv2eAKCu02W7Pu7oDz+zZ/hWzyhOrNYPPACeOcvo
mT4UxCfGuVIKC8gIcDFGt8U=
=dV3k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----