[oe] [PATCH] am-benchmarks: update to latest version

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2010/9/29 Maupin, Chase <chase.maupin at ti.com>:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org
>> [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces at lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
>> Frans Meulenbroeks
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:24 AM
>> To: openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>> Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] am-benchmarks: update to latest version
>>
>> 2010/9/29 Chase Maupin <chasemaupin03 at gmail.com>:
>> > * Updated the SRCREV to the latest version of this project
>> >  which includes support for multiple platforms.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin <chase.maupin at ti.com>
>> > ---
>> >  recipes/ti/am-benchmarks_svn.bb |   12 +++++++++---
>> >  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>>
>> Don't have the full recipe handy, but is this latter UNDEFINED needed?
>> I would expect a COMPATIBLE_MACHINE somewhere causing the latter never
>> to happen.
>> Then again it might be a good safeguard.
>
> Frans,
>
> Good point.  In the past there was no difference between arm9 and cortex-a8 so we didn't really concern ourselves with COMPATIBLE_MACHINE because the code was supposed to be buildable for all of the different machines.  Now we have these different directories containing sources for the different architectures.  We could use compatible machine so I could go either way on this.  Let me know if you want me to change this.

I prefer to use e.g. COMPATIBLE_MACHINE.
That inhibits building a recipe for a machine for which it is not intended.

Frans.