[oe] libgcc-dev.ipk not created Fwd: [Gumstix-users] question about libgcc-dev

J. L. vwyodapink at gmail.com
Thu Sep 30 20:07:49 UTC 2010


On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:09 PM, J. L. <vwyodapink at gmail.com> wrote:
> I originally posted this on the gumstix mailing list and was told I
> should ask here. I was wondering how come there is no libgcc-dev.ipk
> that gets created though its in the work directory? I was trying to
> compile a program on my machine and was giving me complaints about
> libgcc-dev missing. Is this suppose to happen or? Thanks for any info
> or help on this.
>
> JL

Is there an easy way to gcc to build the libgcc-dev package? I am
honestly clueless as to how to even attempt to getting that to be
added into the builds.


>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Steve Sakoman <sakoman at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users] question about libgcc-dev
> To: "General mailing list for gumstix users."
> <gumstix-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:07 PM, J. L. <vwyodapink at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Steve Sakoman <sakoman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:20 AM, J. L. <vwyodapink at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I was trying to install libpcap-dev and libpcre-dev and when I did
>>>> they both said that libgcc-dev was an unmet dependency. I have tried
>>>> searching and can not seem to figure out what provides that? I am sure
>>>> this is a really basic one that I am missing. Thanks if you can let me
>>>> know what to build to get that.
>>>
>>> The gcc recipe provides libgcc-dev
>>
>> I checked in the tmp and it only builds a libgcc1_4.3.3 which I
>> already had on the system when it gave that error. I also dont see
>> anything saying its a dev for anything in the gcc tmp build. Am I
>> still missing something obvious here?
>
> I found it by searching through the tmp directory:
>
> $ ls -l tmp/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc-4.3.3-r17.1/packages-split/
> | grep libgcc-dev
>
> drwxrwxr-x 2 sakoman sakoman 4096 2010-09-17 20:22 libgcc-dev
>
> But you are correct, the recipe doesn't seem to put an ipk in the
> deploy directory.  Not sure why!
>
> Might be better to ask this question to the experts on the OE mailing list.
>
> Steve
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> gumstix-users mailing list
> gumstix-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users
>




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list