[oe] [PATCHv2] kernel/module-base: Append PR to MACHINE_KERNEL_PR

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04-04-11 20:12, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 07:54 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 04-04-11 17:14, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>> On 04/04/2011 03:58 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>> On 04-04-11 15:00, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
>>>>> Ping. Any votes for or against this patch with either appended or
>>>>> prepended PR?
>>>>
>>>> I don't like this patch *at all*. Recipes can already do
>>>> MACHINE_KERNEL_PR_append = "something" if they need to.
>>
>>> The use of MACHINE_KERNEL_PR is optional, so it feels really wrong to
>>> append something to it in a recipe.
>>
>>>> Can you should me a specific example on how this would be an improvement?
>>
>>> With the version below. a distro can start to use MACHINE_KERNEL_PR any
>>> time without breaking updates.
>>
>>> The vast majority of modules do not use MACHINE_KERNEL_PR
>>
>> It seems you don't understand how MACHINE_KERNEL_PR works. The *machine*
>> sets it. The distro has *no* say in it. Therefore the module recipes
>> don't need to set it, since it's automatic.
> 
> That's nitpicking. Let me rephrase:
> 
> With the previously cited version. a *machine* can start to use
> MACHINE_KERNEL_PR any time without breaking updates.
> 
> The vast majority of module recipes do not use MACHINE_KERNEL_PR. That
> means that they use their own PR instead of appending something to
> MACHINE_KERNEL_PR, as suggested by you. Setting MACHINE_KERNEL_PR in the
> machine's configuration disables automatic rebuilds of 91% of module
> recipes.

So make all the module recipes use MACHINE_KERNEL_PR and ditch PR. Doing
all the appending in different classes is just fixing this at the wrong end.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNmrUMMkyGM64RGpERAuLPAJ9YYQEQj0H8R3uncTqpCqx0AtGkpQCeIqlA
RmVtl113MqrJ6axwCMYyhkU=
=rvEk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----