[oe] [PATCH 1/2] tzcode-native: update to 2011e

[Robert Foerster]

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Antonio Ospite <ospite at studenti.unina.it>wrote:

> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:36:34 +0200
> Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:31:20PM -0400, Bob Foerster wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bob Foerster <robert at erafx.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  ...code-native_2011d.bb => tzcode-native_2011e.bb} |   11
> ++++++-----
> > > >  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >  rename recipes/tzcode/{tzcode-native_2011d.bb =>
> tzcode-native_2011e.bb} (51%)
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can you please add LICENSE and LIC_FILES_CHKSUM fields? The same for
> tzdata.
> > >
> > > Something like this:
> > > OE nokia900 at shr ~/shr-core $ grep LIC
> > > openembedded-core/meta/recipes-extended/tzdata/tzdata_2010o.bb
> > > LICENSE = "PD"
> > > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
> "file://asia;beginline=2;endline=3;md5=06468c0e84ef4d4c97045a4a29b08234"
> > > OE nokia900 at shr ~/shr-core $ grep LIC
> > > openembedded-core/meta/recipes-extended/tzcode/tzcode-native_2009r.bb
> > > LICENSE = "Public Domain"
> > > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
> "file://${WORKDIR}/README;md5=3ae8198f82258417ce29066d3b034035"
> >
> > or a bit newer tzcode :)
> >
> > OE nokia900 at shr ~/shr-core $ grep LIC meta-shr/recipes-extended/tzcode/
> tzcode-native_2011d.bb
> > LICENSE = "PD"
> > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://README;md5=3ae8198f82258417ce29066d3b034035"
> >
>
> Bob tell us if you are interested about adding those yourself and if so,
> if you are going to send incremental patches on top of your v2, so we
> separate the version update from the recipe upgrade about LICENSE, and
> I can merge your v2 as it is now.
>
>

Commit v2 as it as.  I will submit new patches later today with the LIC
info.



> Regards,
>    Antonio
>
> --
> Antonio Ospite
> http://ao2.it
>
> PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>