[oe] [PATCH 2/6] conf/bitbake: improve compression image handling
Tom Rini
tom_rini at mentor.com
Thu Apr 7 23:48:54 UTC 2011
On 04/07/2011 10:29 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 14:23, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 13:19 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> XZ_COMPRESSION_LEVEL ?= "-e -9"
>>> LZMA_COMPRESSION_LEVEL ?= "-e -9"
>>> +GZIP_COMPRESSION_LEVEL ?= "-9"
>>> +BZIP2_COMPRESSION_LEVEL ?= "-9"
>>
>> It seems a bit sad to have to keep adding new vars to the global
>> configuration set (and hence parse them for every single recipe) every
>> time someone wants to tweak a new compression format. Can we not just
>> have a single IMAGE_COMPRESSION_LEVEL that does for everything?
>
> For me it doesn't matter; I can add it if preferred.
Why are we even tweaking gzip/bzip2? XZ/LZMA can have serious tradeoffs
at higher levels but I thought for bzip2/gzip it was either do it or no
compression, not "turn it down a little bit".
--
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list