[oe] [beagleboard] Unable to build Angstrom meta-toolchain

[Stefan Herbrechtsmeier]

Am 19.08.2011 16:32, schrieb Khem Raj:
> On 8/19/2011 6:18 AM, Philip Balister wrote:
>> On 08/19/2011 02:33 AM, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
>>> Am 18.08.2011 19:48, schrieb Peter Housel:
>>>> On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 15:10 +0200, fabian büttner wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am having troubles compiling the Angstrom SDK.
>>>>>
>>>>> I used the angstrom-setup-scripts to configure OE, sourced the
>>>>> environment settings and built the base-image/console-image with
>>>>> bitbake.
>>>>>
>>>>> While trying to compile the meta-toolchain, just when bitmake 
>>>>> finishes
>>>>> downloading task-sdk-bare_1.0-r2.6_armv7a.ipk, I am getting an error
>>>>> output like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://pastie.org/2390409
>>>>>
>>>>> After that, I tried building the meta-toolchain(i did a bitmake clean
>>>>> meta-toolchain) without '-j2' but the error I receive is ultimately
>>>>> the same:
>>>>> * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies
>>>>> * for task-sdk-bare:
>>>>> * libstdc++-dev *
>>>>> * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package task-sdk-bare.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately I am too unexperienced with OE/Angstrom to fix bugs
>>>>> like that.
>>>>> Maybe someone could give me a hint how to get around this 
>>>>> show-stopper?
>>>> I can confirm that I've been seeing this as well on recent
>>>> 2011.03-maintenance, but haven't had a chance to troubleshoot the root
>>>> cause yet.
>>>>
>>> It was inbtroduced with commit 105d881227d06f31c180dffb777ee63361b2f2b8
>>> "gcc: Package libstdc++ gdb python helpers into dev package".
>>> If no helpers exist the empty package will not be generated.
>>> I have try to add
>>> ALLOW_EMPTY_libstdc++-dev = "1"
>>> to gcc-package-cross.inc but this breaks meta-toolchain as the files in
>>> ${prefix}/${TARGET_SYS}/usr/include/c++ are missing.
>>>
>>> Only removing libstdc++-dev package from gcc-package-cross.inc fix the
>>> problem.
>>
>> Does anyone know if dv has the same problem? I can't check easily at the
>> moment.
>
> what happens if you remove  libstdc++-dev libgcc-dev from PACKAGES in 
> recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc ?
Maybe I was not precise enough above, but removing libstdc++-dev from 
PACKAGES
in recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc and bump INC_PR in gcc-4.3.3.inc 
fix the problems.