[oe] `PR = "r0"`: Add or not to add? (was: thunar-volman: Add initial recipe with version 0.6.0)

[Paul Menzel]

Am Mittwoch, den 31.08.2011, 09:15 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi:
> Op 31-08-11 01:06, Andreas Müller schreef:
> > * build & partially run tested on overo
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony at gmx.de> --- .../thunar-volman/thunar-volman_0.6.0.bb           |   12 ++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/thunar-volman/thunar-volman_0.6.0.bb
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/thunar-volman/thunar-volman_0.6.0.bb b/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/thunar-volman/thunar-volman_0.6.0.bb new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ad11d84 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta-xfce/recipes-xfce/thunar-volman/thunar-volman_0.6.0.bb @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +DESCRIPTION =
> > "Automatic management of removable drives and media for thunar" +SECTION = "x11" +LICENSE = "GPLv2" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=94d55d512a9ba36caa9b7df079bae19f" +DEPENDS = "exo gtk+ libxfce4ui libxfce4util xfconf libnotify" + +PR = "r0"

(Koen, your messages are still not displayed correctly. The line breaks
are missing. Could you check your setup? Your messages are the only ones
displaying that problem [1].)

> please remove PR in new recipes

Actually I would favor to leave them in. The manual also advises to do
this. To change that policy, I would favor a survey/poll so that not
every developers says something different as s/he sees best fit.


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-August/034698.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20110831/b3c5b907/attachment-0002.sig>