[oe] [PATCH] insane.bbclass: Make RPATH a non-fatal error

[Tom Rini]

On 02/20/2011 05:42 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2011/2/19 Tom Rini<tom_rini at mentor.com>:
>> On 02/19/2011 06:26 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:52, Andreas Mueller<schnitzeltony at gmx.de>
>>>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday 19 February 2011 10:45:38 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am fine with the patch, but perhaps a better solution would be to
>>>>> introduce a var to decide whether it is a fatal or not.
>>>>> That way people distro's that use libtool 2.4 can decide to make it a
>>>>> fatal. (or individual users in their local.conf)
>>>>>
>>>>> Frans
>>>>
>>>> How comes that I sometimes feel handled as spammer ;-) ?
>>>>
>>>> see http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-
>>>> February/029534.html
>>>>
>>>> anyway - treating RPATH errors as fatal has lead to many QA fixes and
>>>> further
>>>> will follow...
>>>>
>>>> my opinion now: keep RPATH errors fatal as developer's  whip :-)
>>>
>>> I agree about keeping it configurable.
>>>
>>> Besides I think that we ought to keep it fatal until quite near of
>>> release since we'll be "forced" to fix most of many of them.
>>
>> I just want to state, again, that most of these just go away with libtool
>> 2.4.  Now, if people are looking for something to work on that won't just go
>> away with an update to libtool 2.4:
>> - iscsi-target needs some love again for various kernel versions as that
>> looks to be killing calamari and neek for nas-server-image
>
> Peeked at iscsi-target for calamari. Some inet fields have changed
> name in 2.6.32 or so, and apparently this is not handled fully.
> Instead of trying to fix it, I moved the calamari recipe to 2.6.34
> (which I'm already using for half a year or so, but apparently never
> pushed).

Thanks.

> I'll also see if I can update the neek version (probably also by
> moving the kernel version forward.
> Tomorrow I'll discuss this with Walter who afaik is the only other neek user.

Note that I also see:
- uclibc total failure, but I assume unsupported and I'll drop
- minimal fails everywhere else with:
ERROR: QA Issue with staging: libsupc++.la failed sanity test (workdir) 
in path 
/var/hudson/workspace/sb_openembedded_autobuilder/BBPKGS/native-sdk-image/DISTRO/minimal/MACHINE/neek/label/sb-u1004/tmp/sysroots/nios2-linux/usr/lib
ERROR: QA Issue with staging: libstdc++.la failed sanity test (workdir) 
in path 
/var/hudson/workspace/sb_openembedded_autobuilder/BBPKGS/native-sdk-image/DISTRO/minimal/MACHINE/neek/label/sb-u1004/tmp/sysroots/nios2-linux/usr/lib
ERROR: QA staging was broken by the package built above

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation