[oe] [PATCH] busybox: fix udhcp check for NFS rootfs for new style /proc/mounts

Denys Dmytriyenko denis at denix.org
Thu Feb 24 03:26:23 UTC 2011


On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:59:43AM +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> Hello Denys,
> 
> On 02/24/2011 02:31 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > diff --git a/recipes/busybox/busybox-1.13.2/udhcpc-new-nfsroot.patch b/recipes/busybox/busybox-1.13.2/udhcpc-new-nfsroot.patch
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..46aaab9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/recipes/busybox/busybox-1.13.2/udhcpc-new-nfsroot.patch
> > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> > +diff -uNr busybox-1.13.2.orig/examples/udhcp/simple.script busybox-1.13.2/examples/udhcp/simple.script
> > +--- busybox-1.13.2.orig/examples/udhcp/simple.script	2011-02-23 00:30:32.000000000 -0500
> > ++++ busybox-1.13.2/examples/udhcp/simple.script	2011-02-23 17:05:37.873381763 -0500
> > +@@ -10,7 +10,12 @@
> > + 
> > + # return 0 if root is mounted on a network filesystem
> > + root_is_nfs() {
> > ++	# old style mounts
> > + 	grep -qe '^/dev/root.*\(nfs\|smbfs\|ncp\|coda\) .*' /proc/mounts
> > ++	if ! $? ; then
> > ++		# new style mounts
> > ++		grep -qe '^.*:.* / \(nfs\|smbfs\|ncp\|coda\) .*' /proc/mounts
> > ++	fi
> 
> Would "grep -qe '^\S\+ / \(nfs\|smbfs\|ncp\|coda\) ' /proc/mounts" work
> for both cases?

Andreas,

As I mentioned in the patch description:

* The regexp in grep can be simplified and rolled into one, but may become
less strict...

So, it's definitely possible, but I was worried the regexp would become too 
loose and return false positives. Plus, I'm not sure how \S\+ would work on 
spaces in the pathname, such as My\ Documents.

> > diff --git a/recipes/busybox/busybox_1.1x.inc b/recipes/busybox/busybox_1.1x.inc
> > index 7623944..aefa57f 100644
> > --- a/recipes/busybox/busybox_1.1x.inc
> > +++ b/recipes/busybox/busybox_1.1x.inc
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
> >    file://fdisk_nios2.patch \
> >    file://udhcpscript.patch \
> >    file://udhcpc-fix-nfsroot.patch \
> > +  file://udhcpc-new-nfsroot.patch \
> 
> Should the two patches above be merged into a single patch?

That can be done, if people feel strongly about it...

-- 
Denys




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list