[oe] [PATCH] eglibc: Make it configurable by tuning eglibc options

[Khem Raj]

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 15:30, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Maybe it would be better to introduce EGLIBC_FEATURES and
>>> BUSYBOX_FEATURES, possibly presetting some values with options already
>>> present in DISTRO_FEATURES.
>>>
>>
>> I think it can get to many knobs and confusion in settings. With
>> system library any feature en|disable
>> is system  wide so having it as a distro policy is right way to go imo.
>
> We can use DISTRO_EGLIBC_FEATURES or DISTRO_LIBC_FEATURES (so we can
> add to uclibc support for it too). Spliting it from DISTRO_FEATURES
> makes sense IMO since we'd use the same concept to recipes (as
> busybox) that are ofthen customized.

so what would be difference between DISTRO_FEATURES and DISTRO_EGLIBC_FEATURES
and what will be their relation

>
> --
> Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>