[oe] [PATCH 1/2] minimal.conf: Prefer perl 5.10.1 and opie 1.2.5

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Wed Jan 19 04:29:54 UTC 2011


On (18/01/11 20:59), Tom Rini wrote:
> On 01/17/2011 09:30 PM, Roman I Khimov wrote:
> >В сообщении от Понедельник 17 января 2011 22:14:51 автор Tom Rini написал:
> >>On 01/17/2011 10:50 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>I see different problems with perl 5.10.1 + uclibc + p2020ds, so I guess
> >>this is fine with me.
> >
> >What kind of problems?
> 
> Khem fixed it tonight.  At heart, there's been a need to make much
> better use of the libc-uclibc override rather than testing TARGET_OS
> as there's at least 'linux-uclibc', 'linux-uclibceabi' and
> 'linux-uclibcspe' as valid TARGET_OS combinations.

I thought about it and indeed it would be better to have a LIBC override
but its defined in .inc files which may not be included by all
distributions, if this makes into bitbake.conf somehow then that would
be better or we can decide to have a global data var called LIBC or some
sort.

  perl has been
> doing a test for the first two and Khem added a test for the 3rd.
> This got me to go and audit the recipes for using the _linux-uclibc
> append and switching them en masse to libc-uclibc.  There were a
> very small number of places that had been catching all 3, but for
> the most part it was 80% catching the first two and 20% catching
> just linux-uclibc.  I believe but didn't check that Khem caught the
> rest of the places that were testing for TARGET_OS in shell code and
> updated them for linux-uclibcspe.
> 
> -- 
> Tom Rini
> Mentor Graphics Corporation
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list