[oe] [PATCH 1/2] minimal.conf: Prefer perl 5.10.1 and opie 1.2.5

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com> wrote:
> On 01/18/2011 09:29 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On (18/01/11 20:59), Tom Rini wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/17/2011 09:30 PM, Roman I Khimov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> В сообщении от Понедельник 17 января 2011 22:14:51 автор Tom Rini
>>>> написал:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/17/2011 10:50 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>> I see different problems with perl 5.10.1 + uclibc + p2020ds, so I
>>>>> guess
>>>>> this is fine with me.
>>>>
>>>> What kind of problems?
>>>
>>> Khem fixed it tonight.  At heart, there's been a need to make much
>>> better use of the libc-uclibc override rather than testing TARGET_OS
>>> as there's at least 'linux-uclibc', 'linux-uclibceabi' and
>>> 'linux-uclibcspe' as valid TARGET_OS combinations.
>>
>> I thought about it and indeed it would be better to have a LIBC override
>> but its defined in .inc files which may not be included by all
>> distributions, if this makes into bitbake.conf somehow then that would
>> be better or we can decide to have a global data var called LIBC or some
>> sort.
>
> We already did this.  A distro that doesn't pull in the right libc inc file
> is either broken or on its own (I forget and can't check atm if Angstrom
> uses the files eventually or just also has the libc-foo OVERRIDES, but is
> correct here).

yes angstrom does. Ok I moved slugos to use it recently so its no more broken :)

We also have LIBC as a global env way to say what LIBC to
> use (Angstrom has ANGSTROMLIBC and LIBC since they originated the feature).

nice we can use LIBC as well if need be but override is more elegant
>
> --
> Tom Rini
> Mentor Graphics Corporation
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>