[oe] [meta-oe] patch review for meta-oe (was: [meta-oe][PATCH] rp-pppoe: Port from oe.dev)
Paul Menzel
paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net
Wed Jul 27 14:30:17 UTC 2011
Dear Koen, dear Tom,
I am surprised that you applied Tom’s patch without incorporating my
review.
commit 77d31f8d3027f6ef96bff61da4bf22cf9618bf21
Author: Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com>
AuthorDate: Wed Jul 27 03:46:52 2011 +0000
Commit: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
CommitDate: Tue Jul 26 21:51:39 2011 +0200
rp-pppoe: Port from oe.dev
The difference between this and oe.dev are:
- Reset PR
- Add bitfields site variable to the endian site file
This was wrong in oe.dev for BE (mips).
- Add LIC_FILES_CHKSUM
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tom_rini at mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net>
First of all, the dates do not make any sense at all, so it looks like
you applied it already three minutes after Tom had sent the patch.
I would suggest, that patches get a little more time for review before
you apply them, which is of course disadvantageous for people wanted to
see their patches applied right away.
But I would like to prevent that “messy” patches get applied to the new
repositories to get a better quality.
So Tom, it would be nice if you could sent improvement patches to fix
the `HOMEPAGE` field, the patch headers and the whitespace. The `PR`
cannot be fixed now.
Thanks,
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20110727/f259fe7f/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list