[oe] Missing GLIBC_<version> tags on binaries

[Phil Blundell]

On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 20:18 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On (02/03/11 15:41), Phil Blundell wrote:
> > Yeah, that might be true.  Or we could maybe just switch the default
> > linker to be gold, at least on targets that it supports. 
> 
> Yes I have been doing this slowly for ARM. but probably it will be
> better with gcc 4.6 where linker will be selectable with options

I'm not quite sure I understand what you're saying there.  Can you
clarify?

p.