[oe] [PATCH v2] gupnp_0.13.4/gupnp-av_0.5.9: disable introspection

Koen Kooi k.kooi at student.utwente.nl
Tue Mar 8 12:12:08 UTC 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08-03-11 12:49, Steffen Sledz wrote:
> Am 07.03.2011 18:59, schrieb Tom Rini:
>> On 03/07/2011 09:57 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 17:43 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote:
>>>> --- a/recipes/upnp/gupnp_0.13.4.bb
>>>> +++ b/recipes/upnp/gupnp_0.13.4.bb
>>>> @@ -2,13 +2,14 @@ LICENSE = "LGPL"
>>>>   DEPENDS = "e2fsprogs gssdp libsoup-2.4 libxml2 gtk-doc-native libgee"
>>>>
>>>>   require gupnp.inc
>>>> +PR = "1"
>>
>> "r1"
>>
>>>>
>>>>   SRC_URI[md5sum] = "0d562f5f02534c70c3743b2c514db8ba"
>>>>   SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "7974953f38a41236c875c3df509abc43e8218b5925fdc18212a73b1ae0d0e7e8"
>>>>
>>>>   inherit autotools pkgconfig
>>>>
>>>> -EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-gtk-doc"
>>>> +EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-gtk-doc --enable-introspection=no"
>>>
>>> I can't help thinking that there must be a better place to put this,
>>> maybe even autotools.bbclass.  We basically want those options for all
>>> packages that will take them, right?
>>
>> Usually this is just in "gnome" stuff and gnome or gnomebase does handle this.  But indeed, perhaps this is something that should be more widely passed in to avoid semi-random breakage.
> 
> Can i get some acks for my patch at least as an interim solution? Currently the build is broken! This really is a blocker. :(

NAK, fix the PRs first
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFNdh0YMkyGM64RGpERArXvAJ4yt7VoI/RK4hA6cvmx5ReKJY9HdgCfTcEv
iTy/5tw2fyZNUrND8EU0U8Y=
=JAUx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list