[oe] [PATCH] transmission: add recipe for 2.22 version

[Graeme Gregory]

On 11/03/2011 14:54, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Graeme,
>
>
> Am Freitag, den 11.03.2011, 11:00 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
>
>> Am Freitag, den 11.03.2011, 02:03 +0100 schrieb Lukas-David Gorris:
>>> Depends on the the previously sent libevent bump.
>> Using `git format-patch -2 -s` you can create patches where the
>> dependencies are shown in the subject, e. g. [PATCH 1/2] and [PATCH
>> 2/2].
>>
>>> From: Lukas-David Gorris <lukas.gorris at gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:00:56 +0100
>>> Subject: [oe] [PATCH] transmission: add recipe for 2.22 version
>> As already written in another thread, your MUA mangled the patches.
>> Please turn off automatic line wrapping (normal to preformatted) or
>> using `git send-email`.
>>
>> Your Signed-off-by line is also missing as demanded by the commit policy
>> [1].
>>
>> Secondly, I would appreciate if you could add to the commit message,
>> what build configuration you tested your new recipe/patch with and if
>> all operations worked when running it.
>>
>>> ---
>>>  recipes/transmission/transmission_2.22.bb |    9 +++++++++
>>>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 recipes/transmission/transmission_2.22.bb
>>>
>>> diff --git a/recipes/transmission/transmission_2.22.bb
>>> b/recipes/transmission/transmission_2.22.bb
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..e9a7891
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/recipes/transmission/transmission_2.22.bb
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>>> +require transmission.inc
>>> +
>>> +DEPENDS += "libevent"
>>> +
>>> +PR = ${INC_PR}.1
>> You should start at 0.
>>
>>> +SRC_URI[archive.md5sum] = "6499986bf769276310b00bda1090090d"
>>> +SRC_URI[archive.sha256sum] = "5a4079194f45260c143f21ea6f33ce2660d89fca02ad8f1e65169968d365e4d4"
> why did you commit in e124c44f [1] without my remarks being addressed?
> Also the things you put into the commit message could have been left
> out.
>
>
I got your comments long after I had already done the commits. Im
getting a lot of OE emails seriously delayed today.

I used pw-am as per the process recomended.

Graeme