[oe] [PATCH] gtk+: define empty PACKAGES_DYNAMIC_virtclass-native

[Phil Blundell]

On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:57 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:29:39PM +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:08 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > --- a/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.18.6.bb
> > > +++ b/recipes/gtk+/gtk+_2.18.6.bb
> > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-libtiff ${XKBTOGGLE} --disable-glibtest gio_can_sniff=yes
> > >  EXTRA_OECONF_append_virtclass-native = " --without-libtiff --without-libjpeg --disable-cups"
> > >  
> > >  PACKAGES_DYNAMIC = "gtk-module-* gdk-pixbuf-loader-* gtk-immodule-* gtk-printbackend-*"
> > > +PACKAGES_DYNAMIC_virtclass-native = ""
> > 
> > Can you not put this in gtk+.inc?
> 
> Not all 13 versions we have are including gtk+.inc. But after rechecking
> I could put it only to 4 recipes (I'll resend smaller patch).
> 
> bitbake at jama ~/dev/recipes/gtk+ $ git grep BBCLASSEXTEND
> gtk+_2.14.2.bb:BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
> gtk+_2.18.6.bb:BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
> gtk+_2.20.0.bb:BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
> gtk+_2.20.1.bb:BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
> 
> and let the older versions die with migration to meta-oe or let
> someone who cares about gtk to remove them completely.

The four versions you mentioned there do all include gtk+.inc (only the
very old ones like 2.6 don't).  So you can put it there and make an even
smaller patch with the same effect.

p.