[oe] [PATCH 01/12] libnl: rename libnl2 to libnl as used in openembedded-core

[Martin Jansa]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:47:55AM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 15:00, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > * libnl1/libnl2 still conflicts even when using separate includedir so
> >   it will be easier for distro maintainers to use only libnl1 or libnl2
> >   by PREFERRED_VERSION
> 
> For distros that want to support network-manager that still means that
> both versions are being build and may clash as we have seen before.

How do you build 2 versions of same package? Whole point of this patch
series is to force distromaintainers to use only libnl_2.0.0 or
libnl_1.1.0 based on PREFERRED_VERSION_libnl and this way keep them away
from shooting own foot by accident.

> Just a remark. Personally I would like to go this route and maybe get
> rid of libnl1 at all.

Yes this is step in direction to get rid of libnl1 :). I'm using
libnl_2.0.0 from oe-core in meta-shr, so this change is making diff
between recipes in oe.dev and meta-shr smaller.

Regards,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20110323/f48375e1/attachment-0002.sig>