[oe] x86_64
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Tue May 10 18:43:22 UTC 2011
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:51:47PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
>On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 18:15 +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:06:44AM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> >"x86_64" seems to be what's currently used as the architecture name. If
>>
>> That doesn't work as arch-dependent e.g. append, does it.
>>
>> FOO_append_x86_64 = '-mcpu=barcelona'
>
>It seems to work just fine for me. What goes wrong for you?
It was OVERRIDES as Enrico mentioned.
Given that both khem in (IIRC) 2009 and me a year later stumbled across
the name and abandoned the thing in consequence, settling on an example
name would be nice -- nowadays i would just use amd64 but that won't
happen anytime soon, unfortunately.
Both patches should be in the old patchwork, for reference.
cheers,
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list