[oe] [PATCH][meta-oe] systemd: add postrm u-a calls

[Anders Darander]

* Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> [111110 08:57]:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:44:49AM +0100, Anders Darander wrote:
> > * Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> [111109 20:25]:
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb |   11 +++++++++--
> > >  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

> > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb
> > > index 90862a3..d1d4306 100644
> > > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb
> > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb
> > > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ inherit gitpkgv
> > >  # TODO:
> > >  # u-a for runlevel and telinit
> > > -# u-a prerm

> > Here on your todo list, it stated u-a for prerm, but you applied it to
> > the postrm. In this case, it probably doesn't really matter, but I'd
> > still guess that it would make more sense to remove the u-a before
> > removing the binaries. Although, I don't think it'll actually cause any
> > problems in this case.

> I did what u-a.bbclass usually do.. if you think it should be in prerm
> then it would be best to first fix in u-a.bbclass and then we can update
> the rest of metadata.

Yeah, like I said, is't likely not a real problem. There'll probably
just be a tiny window during which, in this case, e.g. reboot isn't
available, before u-a has been told to change the reboot link.

I'm currently just a little bit catious as I've recently stumbled upon
post-/prerm issues using rpm... (Although the ones I know of (busybox
updates, rsyslog removal) are either fixed or there has been patches
submitted).

I'll see if I ever get the time to look into it.

Cheers,
Anders

-- 
Anders Darander
ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB